OnzeActuFR
DIRECT
PSG remporte la Ligue des Champions 4-2 · Mbappé Ballon d'Or 2026 favori · Ligue 1 : le classement de la journée
← Back to news
International

CONCACAF, far from a united front: Mexico takes its time and studies

By OnzeActu · · 5 min read

CONCACAF, far from a united front: Mexico takes its time and studies

Mexico breaks away from CONCACAF's common position and launches an internal study on Infantino's proposal concerning the opening of World Cup infrastructures to private investors.

According to Tuttomercatoweb.

Context

The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) stands out for its cautious approach to FIFA's proposal, which could allow it to play a key role in future discussions regarding the financing of infrastructure linked to the World Cup. As one of the three host countries for the 2026 World Cup, Mexico could benefit from increased support if Infantino's plan is implemented.

Why it matters

Mexico's decision to conduct an in-depth study on Infantino's proposal could influence the future development of football in the country. By deviating from the collective position of CONCACAF, the Mexican Football Federation (FMF) shows a willingness to explore opportunities that could benefit its infrastructure and football development, especially as the 2026 World Cup approaches.

Key points

  • CONCACAF, far from a united front: Mexico takes its time and studies.
  • Mexico breaks away from CONCACAF's common position and launches an internal study on Infantino's proposal regarding opening World Cup infrastructure to private investors.
  • CONCACAF, still the united front! Il Messico takes time and value on the Infantino piano.

The hostile front to the project carried by Gianni Infantino within CONCACAF seems to be widening... but not in a completely uniform manner. While 41 federations affiliated with the North Central American confederation have officially rejected FIFA's proposal to open World Cup-related infrastructure to investment funds, the Mexican Football Federation (FMF) has chosen a different stance: caution and careful consideration.

In an official press release published recently, the FMF explained that it wanted to “carry out this process of study and analysis with the aim of making the most appropriate decision for the development of Mexican football”. This formulation reflects a desire not to close the door to the initiative immediately, contrary to the line adopted collectively by the majority of CONCACAF federations.

The FMF's position comes shortly after the announcement of the rejection of the project by the confederation, which notably includes the federations of the United States and Canada - two of the three host countries of the 2026 World Cup with Mexico. The project presented by the FIFA president provides for the possibility of involving private investors in the commercial management of competitions organized by FIFA via the creation of a new corporate structure.

ImageImage

This proposal immediately sparked very strong reactions on the European scene: UEFA was opposed to the plan and even raised the possibility of studying a boycott of future editions of the World Cup if such a reform was adopted. Faced with these oppositions, the Mexican position, more measured, could weigh in regional and global debates.

Concretely, the attitude of the FMF means that the final decision will not be automatic and that internal expertise will have to assess risks, potential benefits and consequences for the infrastructure and the development of national football. For observers, this reflection period illustrates the complexity of the issue: significant financial issues, sporting sovereignty and the image of competitions are at the heart of the debate.

The controversy is likely to continue in the coming weeks, as FIFA continues its advocacy to attract private capital into a revamped governance. Between pressure from regional federations, reluctance from European authorities and caution from influential members like Mexico, Infantino's project remains far from being acquired and promises to fuel numerous discussions before any final decision.

The rest

The FMF is expected to finalize its analysis before making an official decision, which could impact CONCACAF's position as a whole. If Mexico chooses to support Infantino's project, it could create tensions within the confederation, especially with the other host countries of the 2026 World Cup, such as the United States and Canada, who have already rejected the proposal.

Frequently asked questions

What happened with Gianni Infantino's project?

41 CONCACAF federations have rejected FIFA's proposal to open World Cup infrastructure to investment funds.

Who confirmed the position of the Mexican Football Federation?

The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) confirmed its position in an official statement.

Why is the FMF taking its time to study Infantino's plan?

The FMF wishes to carry out a process of study and analysis to make the most appropriate decision for the

development of Mexican football.

What are the reactions of the other CONCACAF federations?

The majority of CONCACAF federations, including those in the United States and Canada, rejected the project.

What changes does Infantino's project propose for football?

The project plans to involve private investors in the commercial management of competitions organized by FIFA.

Related Articles

Partager

Frequently asked questions

📰Related articles