OnzeActuFR
DIRECT
PSG remporte la Ligue des Champions 4-2 · Mbappé Ballon d'Or 2026 favori · Ligue 1 : le classement de la journée
← Back to news
International

The president of the Portuguese Arbitration Council refutes

By OnzeActu · · 5 min read

The president of the Portuguese Arbitration Council refutes

At the heart of a controversy in Portugal, Luciano Gonçalves, head of arbitration, firmly rejects accusations of corruption and assures that he has never favored a club or accepted gifts.

According to Mundodeportivo.

Context

Luciano Gonçalves, as president of the FPF Refereeing Council, plays a key role in the management of referees in Portugal. The accusations against him could affect not only his reputation, but also that of the entire arbitration system in the country. The current situation could also impact players like Duarte Gomes, who play in an environment where trust in refereeing is essential.

Why it matters

Accusations of corruption in Portuguese football, particularly those targeting Luciano Gonçalves, raise major concerns about the integrity of the competitions. The Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) must manage this crisis to maintain the confidence of fans and clubs. Transparency in arbitration procedures is crucial to avoid similar scandals in the future.

Key points

  • The president of the Portuguese Arbitration Council refutes.
  • At the heart of a controversy in Portugal, Luciano Gonçalves, head of arbitration, firmly rejects accusations of corruption and assures that he has never favored a club or accepted gifts.
  • The arbitral judge in Portugal defends himself from accusations of corruption.

The president of the Arbitration Council of the Portuguese Football Federation (FPF), Luciano Gonçalves, publicly defended himself this Saturday against the serious accusations of corruption weighing on him. These allegations follow an investigation opened by the Portuguese police concerning possible influence peddling in the appointment of referees in certain decisive matches.

In a statement to the press, Gonçalves firmly rejected all these accusations. He claims to have “never agreed with any club president on the choice of a referee”, to have “never received the slightest payment” from the teams, nor accepted financial or other rewards. He also specifies that a club or a president has never offered him vacations, stays or covered personal expenses. He describes these “insinuations” as “totally false” and denounces what he describes as an “orchestrated campaign” against his person.

The president of the Arbitration Council also ensures that he is “fully available to the competent authorities to provide all the necessary clarifications” as part of the ongoing investigation.

For its part, the FPF Arbitration Council expressed its unwavering support for Luciano Gonçalves, both at an institutional and personal level. He recalled that legal proceedings must take their course while respecting the presumption of innocence, avoiding “media judgments”. The Council trusts the institutions to shed light on this matter.

This controversy erupted last June, when a former international referee and former technical director of refereeing at the FPF, Duarte Gomes, resigned after discovering and denouncing possible manipulation in the appointment of officials. According to an internal investigation at the Federation, these accusations concern the allegedly anticipated and “on demand” appointment of referees for decisive matches with a view to remaining in the first division, in particular involving the Estrela da Amadora club.

This case sheds harsh light on the internal functioning of Portuguese arbitration, raising concerns and expectations regarding the legal and disciplinary consequences that could result from it. In the meantime, Luciano Gonçalves wants to defend his integrity and the credibility of the body he leads.

The rest

The Portuguese police investigation into the allegations of influence peddling will continue, and Luciano Gonçalves has expressed his willingness to cooperate fully. The FPF Refereeing Council's support for Gonçalves could influence public perception during this delicate period. The results of the investigation could also have repercussions for other players in Portuguese football, including clubs like Estrela da Amadora.

Frequently asked questions

What accusations did Luciano Gonçalves refute?

Luciano Gonçalves refuted accusations of corruption and influence peddling in the appointment of arbitrators.

Who supported Luciano Gonçalves in this affair?

The Refereeing Council of the Portuguese Football Federation has expressed its support for Luciano Gonçalves.

Why have these accusations appeared now?

These accusations follow an investigation opened by the Portuguese police concerning manipulation in the appointment of referees.

What measures did Luciano Gonçalves take in response to the accusations?

Luciano Gonçalves declared

re be available to the authorities to provide clarifications and firmly rejected the accusations.

What is the context of this controversy?

The controversy erupted after the resignation of Duarte Gomes, a former referee, who denounced possible manipulations in the arbitration.

Related Articles

Partager

Frequently asked questions

📰Related articles