OnzeActuFR
DIRECT
PSG remporte la Ligue des Champions 4-2 · Mbappé Ballon d'Or 2026 favori · Ligue 1 : le classement de la journée
← Back to news
International

“We didn’t know what to do”: why England had so much

By OnzeActu · · 7 min read

“We didn’t know what to do”: why England had so much

After Anthony Gordon's opener, England fell back and Tuchel made more defensive substitutions. A look back at the decisions that enabled Argentina's comeback.

According to Sports.

Context

Wayne Rooney, former England captain, was a first-hand witness to the challenges faced by his country during this semi-final. His comment on the lack of direction after Anthony Gordon's goal highlights the importance of mental and tactical management in decisive moments, especially ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Why it matters

England's defeat in the 2026 FIFA World Cup semi-final against Argentina raises questions about Thomas Tuchel's tactical choices. Despite a promising start with Anthony Gordon's goal, defensive substitutions led to a loss of control, reminiscent of the team's past failures at major tournaments. Wayne Rooney expressed the general feeling of uncertainty that followed the opener, highlighting England's continued challenges in crucial moments.

Key points

  • “We didn’t know what to do”: why England has so much.
  • After Anthony Gordon's opener, England fell back and Tuchel made more defensive substitutions.
  • ‘We didn’t know what to do’: Why did England make so many defensive changes? - Yahoo Sports.

England let a precious lead slip away against Argentina in the semi-final of the 2026 World Cup, and at the heart of the criticism are Thomas Tuchel's defensive choices. After Anthony Gordon's goal in the second half which made the Three Lions dream of a first men's world final in 60 years, the English coach made several defensive substitutions which significantly changed the face of the team.

Wayne Rooney, former captain of the Three Lions, did not hesitate to sum up the general feeling: “We didn't know what to do” after the opening score. The match quickly turned in favor of the Argentines, who, true to their usual form during this tournament, did not panic. Lionel Messi and his teammates, having already overturned close encounters to reach this semi-final, pushed and made decisive offensive changes with Nico González, Rodrigo De Paul then Lautaro Martínez.

The turning point came in the 72nd minute when Tuchel removed striker Anthony Gordon to bring on defender Ezri Konsa, switching to a five-man defense with Konsa as the central third. In the 82nd minute, a double defensive change followed: Dan Burn and Nico O'Reilly came on in place of Declan Rice and injured right-back Reece James. At that point, England had six defenders on the field.

ImageImage

The Argentine counterattack paid off: Enzo Fernández equalized in the 85th minute, and Lautaro Martínez scored the winning goal at the very start of long added time (2nd minute of the nine minutes allowed). Tuchel then tried to react by throwing on Marcus Rashford and Ivan Toney late in the match, but it was too late.

On the BBC set, former goalkeeper Joe Hart strongly criticized the decision to move to a back five, saying that Tuchel had “said he no longer believed in his team”. Micah Richards pointed out the initial objective of Tuchel's appointment - to take England to a new level - and judged that tactically the coach had made a mistake. Captain Harry Kane also regretted a lack of ambition after the goal: “When we went in front, we seemed to want to hold on. At this level, it is not enough. »

Tuchel, for his part, took responsibility for his choices while recognizing that his team had become too “passive” after the goal. He explained that he opted for the five-man defense to “close the spaces inside and be strong in the aerial game”, pointing to the numerous crosses and the physical domination of the Argentine players. He said he had "no regrets", refuting the idea of ​​a structural problem and pointing out that he had also made offensive changes in other matches.

This defeat recalls painful past tournament endings for England – such as the 2018 semi-final against Croatia and the Euro 2020 final against Italy – where the team also gave in after taking the advantage. The debate is now open on the balance between prudence and ambition when the stakes are highest, and on Tuchel's ability to convince his group not to back down in the face of opposing pressure.

The rest

England will need to analyze this defeat to avoid repeating past mistakes, especially during major competitions like the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Criticism of Tuchel's match management could influence his future decisions, as the team prepares for upcoming events. Players, including talents like Anthony Gordon, will also need to focus on their development to strengthen the national team for future tournaments.

Frequently asked questions

Why did England change their defense in the semi-final?

England changed their defense after taking the lead through an Anthony Gordon goal, but coach Thomas Tuchel's defensive choices were criticized.

Who confirmed the criticism of England's defensive choices?

Wayne Rooney, former Three Lions captain, expressed his general feeling, saying: "We didn't know what to do" after the opener.

What defensive modifications

were carried out by Thomas Tuchel?

Thomas Tuchel replaced Anthony Gordon with Ezri Konsa to move to a five-man defense, then made a double change with Dan Burn and Nico O'Reilly.

Why were these changes made at this point in the match?

The changes were made after England took the lead, but in the face of Argentine pressure, Tuchel looked to strengthen the defense.

What impact did these changes have on the match?

Defensive changes allowed Argentina to get back into the match, with Enzo Fernández equalizing and Lautaro Martínez scoring the winner.

Related Articles

Partager

Frequently asked questions

📰Related articles